This is some text prior to the author information. You can change this text from the admin section of WP-Gravatar To change this standard text, you have to enter some information about your self in the Dashboard -> Users -> Your Profile box. Lese mehr über diesen AutorRiding with robotic arm.. with his face almost hit the ground..
Tags: arm, awesome, ground, head, hit, ride, robot, robotic, Seat
that is stupid. i am studying robotics
never do that.
Why not? o_O
these stupid people probably defining a trajectory in which the rider enjoys. meanwhile this trajectory is transformed into joint space using inverse kinematics. at the same time if there is a slide kinematics or a servo failure in any of the joint, other joints may act in maximum torque. so that this rider could be torn into two pieces. this robot can’t break his head it just tears it from the body. you youtubers can’t estimate the total mechanical power in case of undesired singulatiry etc
i think it’s a fanuc robot, fanuc is a japanese company. they considered this stupid “redneck-like” act as a harrassment and they have the legal right to take the robot back. i just can’t define these guys’ stupidty. i just can’t
Well, I understand a bit more now, but try tell this in Legoland in California: there’s a similar robot for kids there.
One thing though: yes, it can be dangerous, but sometimes theories can differ from practicality. I’ve been working with a CNC lathe for 8 years and in all this time it has failed only a coupla times via software (now it’s mechanically wearing out, but it’s another thing!), and this machine has more than 15 years.
As said down below, check out Legoland, even here in YouTube, there are vids of these robotcoasters. Remember that many things that are new are mainly considered as dangerous, such as TV before, it was said to fry kids’ head and so on; such as the Internet, it’s STILL considered wrongly by many. It’s how you use it: if you abuse it, use it wrongly, well, bad results can happen.
I wonder if those robot coasters have been done by Fanuc…
i watched the videos you mentioned. they are specifically designed for entertainment purposes unlike this robot. robots which are designated for entertainment purposes have to hold many qualification standards and they are subject to many tests. plus, their motion is slower comparing to this one. this one is an industrial one and it is not safe as an entertainment robot.
you are right, most of the time they don’t fail but you CNC lathe is used in its nominal pay load. you did not attached any other things which are ackward to use. in this case they obviously attach a human being which was never considered in the design phase of the robot.
And it’s funny because the robot ain’t got no arms.
They already have these in some theme parks…
as if i didnt explain the differences. welldone
“in Legoland in California: there’s a similar robot for kids there. ”
they are as similar as RC electric car and ship’s power plant.
…why did this come up as a result for “flash mob” for me?
woa, that was insane!
isnt that X3
I wonder what would happen if someone accidentally regurgitated and it landed on the machine, wouldn’t that cause the machine to malfunction?
GM should hire out their robot arms for rides instead of making cars!
oh ok. nice point. yeah nice one. i laugh, yeah i laugh.
Second :06 he almost hits the ground oO
Brings new meaning to BSOD. (Yes I am aware this comment is two years old, I don’t care.)
were do you ride those at
whoah
*O*
nota 10, uauuuuuuuuuuu…
I would hate to be getting “my turn” when the asteroid from “Maximum Overdrive” came into orbit!
ps nerd alert and over use of ” “”’s ” in one comment